Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066007›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor pathology2026

Gyriform infiltration indicates tumor invasion burden of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2-wildtype gliomas.

Hideyuki Arita, Kentaro Hirai, Mio Sakai, Tatsuya Hagioka, Koji Takano, Toru Umehara, Hidenori Yoshizawa, Yoshinori Kodama, Nobuo Kashiwagi, Katsuyuki Nakanishi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hideyuki Arita *Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan. neuro.husky@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-8155
Kentaro Hirai *Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Mio SakaiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Tatsuya HagiokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Koji TakanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Toru UmeharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Hidenori YoshizawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Yoshinori KodamaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Nobuo KashiwagiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Katsuyuki NakanishiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Yonehiro KanemuraDepartment of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Institute for Clinical Research, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 20K09324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few robust radiological markers have been identified for predicting the molecular status of gliomas. Recently, gyriform infiltration (GI) has been identified as an imaging biomarker for molecular glioblastoma (mGBM). This study aimed to validate the diagnostic value of GI in predicting the molecular status of diffuse gliomas. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients treated at a single center. Their imaging findings, including GI and the status of molecular markers, including IDH TERT were compared. This study enrolled 137 patients, 16 (12%) of whom, were diagnosed with GI. The vast majority of GI-positive cases were IDH-wildtype (15/16 cases), including four mGBM and six histologically diagnosed glioblastoma cases. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of GI in predicting mGBM were 24% and 90%, respectively, and its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in predicting IDH-wildtype gliomas were 15% and 97%, respectively. GI was also observed in IDH-wildtype gliomas without the molecular and histological features of glioblastoma. All five GI-positive cases with available

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTelomeraseBiomarkers, TumorIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseTelomeraseGlioblastomaGliomaGyriform infiltrationIDH1/2Magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.