Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066005›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2025

Brackish knowledge: exploring the material, epistemic, and institutional entanglements of numerical modelling of the Dutch coast.

Jacqueline Ashkin, Sarah de Rijcke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacqueline AshkinCentre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. j.a.ashkin@cwts.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-4863
Sarah de RijckeCentre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 805550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estuaries, the dynamic transitional zones where rivers converge with oceans, represent complex ecosystems characterized by the mixing of fresh and saltwater, resulting in what is known as brackish water. These coastal interfaces, along with tidal flats and other littoral features, embody a unique duality, existing as neither fully terrestrial nor entirely marine environments. This ambiguous nature poses significant challenges for scientific inquiry when coastal regions become the focus of study. Inspired by Stefan Helmreich's (2011) call to 'think with seawater', we propose the concept of "brackish knowledge" as a way to engage with knowledge practices that are entangled with both the material complexity of the environments they describe and the practical contingencies of the contemporary science system. In this paper, we follow the development and maintenance of the General Estuarine Transport Model (GETM), a hydrodynamic model designed to represent the complex tidal processes in estuaries and shallow shelf-sea areas such as those along the Dutch coast. We show how the model's developers move across and recombine properties that are often framed in opposition to one another, namely the physical and ecological, social and computational, and public and private, in order to continue making knowledge about coastal and estuarine environments. We conclude that the material, epistemic, and institutional dimensions of brackish knowledge should be considered alongside one another in the governing of scientific knowledge about environmental change, since this ultimately shapes what can be known about potential coastal futures.

Indexed as

EcosystemEstuariesKnowledgeModels, TheoreticalHydrodynamicsNetherlandsSeawaterBrackishEstuaryModellingOceanResearch governanceValuation

Identifiers

PMID41066005
PMCPMC12511264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.