ArticleThe ultrasound journal2025
Cerebrovascular reactivity metrics as predictors of cognitive performance in healthy ageing: insights from transcranial colour-coded ultrasound.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-Related Differences in Cerebrovascular Reactivity to L-Arginine in Middle-Aged Type 1 Diabetes Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Research hotspots and trend of the heart-brain axis by MRI: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study was designed to investigate the utility of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) metrics, derived from transcranial colour-coded Doppler ultrasound (TCCD). Three main CVR metrics were examined as potential markers for cerebrovascular risk associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a stage between normal cognition and dementia.
methodsWe investigated 122 eligible, stroke-free, healthy, community-based Chinese adults (mean age, 65.34 ± 6.86 years). Cognitive performance was assessed using the validated Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. On a scale of 0-30, participants with low scores < 26 (modelled according to level of education) were designated to have a mild neurocognitive disorder or MCI. Following the measurement of cerebrovascular conductance (CVC) derived from cerebral blood flow and mean arterial pressure, three physiologic CVR metrics were assessed. The CVR assessments were based on restricted 30 s breath-holding, 60 s hyperventilation, and an unrestricted breath-holding index (BHI), respectively quantified using transcranial colour-coded Doppler ultrasound. The predictabilities and associations between CVR metrics, haemodynamic parameters, and cognitive performance were statistically investigated.
resultsUsing TCCD, BHI emerged as the most accurate and robust metric of CVR for predicting mild cognitive disorders [AUC 0.827 (95% CI 0.725, 0.930)] and independently predicted overall cognitive performance, highlighting its clinical value for early identification of at-risk individuals. The three CVR metrics outperformed CVC in predicting mild cognitive impairment and were distinctively correlated. Although CVR measures by breath-holding and BHI were closely related (r = 0.704, 95% CI 0.598, 0.786, p < 0.001), Bland-Altman analysis revealed that they are not interchangeable, indicating the importance of metric selection for accurate cerebrovascular assessment.
conclusionThe BHI, derived from simple and clinically tolerable methods, demonstrates clear potential to enhance the prediction and early identification of vascular cognitive impairment in healthy adults. By leveraging insights from cerebral haemodynamics, TCCD-based cerebrovascular risk screening may enable more effective and targeted interventions, ultimately contributing to better long-term cognitive health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.