Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065925›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

AI-Driven multi-view learning from CCTA for myocardial infarction diagnosis.

Jakub Gwizdala, Adil Salihu, Ortal Senouf, David Meier, David Rotzinger, Salah Qanadli, Olivier Muller, Pascal Frossard, Emmanuel Abbe, Dorina Thanou and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jakub Gwizdala *Institute of Mathematics, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Adil Salihu *Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ortal SenoufInstitute of Mathematics, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David MeierCardiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David RotzingerRadiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Salah QanadliRadiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier MullerCardiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal FrossardSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emmanuel AbbeInstitute of Mathematics, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dorina ThanouInstitute of Mathematics, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stephane FournierCardiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Denise AubersonCardiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. denise.auberson@chuv.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains a diagnostic challenge, as a proportion of patients do not present with obstructive coronary lesions. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive tool for coronary assessment, and integrating artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance its diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluates a machine learning (ML) model using a learned fusion approach to identify culprit lesions in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients. This study is a sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter trial including patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS who underwent CCTA, followed by ICA and fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in every intermediate stenosis. An ML framework was developed to analyze 2 orthogonal CCTA views of each coronary segment and classify them as culprit or non-culprit, with ICA +/- FFR as gold standards. The model was trained using 5-fold cross-validation and compared against 5 baseline methods, including conventional feature extraction and FFR-CT. Among 80 patients, 514 coronary segments were analyzed, with 63 (12.3%) labeled as culprit. The learned fusion model achieved a sensitivity of 0.55 ± 0.14, specificity of 0.93 ± 0.05, and F1-score of 0.53 ± 0.11. The AUC was 0.84 ± 0.06, matching the performance of FFR-CT (AUC of 0.82 ± 0.08). Our findings demonstrate that the learned fusion approach, based on combining two orthogonal views, achieved a performance level comparable to that of FFR-CT, as shown by the AUC of both techniques. These results confirm that AI-driven CCTA analysis could enhance clinical decision-making in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients, warranting further validation of this method in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsMachine LearningNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligenceCCTA, acute coronary syndromeMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41065925
PMCPMC12987834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.