Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065921›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2025

Additional cartilage treatment for small defects in chronic ankle instability shows no mid-term benefit and delays recovery: a randomized controlled trial.

Raúl Figa Barrios, José María Mora-Guix, Pablo Oscar Roza Miguel, Jesús Vila-Rico

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06947317 (Relevance of Osteochondral Lesions in Ankle Microinstability), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06947317 nacompletednot on this map

Relevance of Osteochondral Lesions in Ankle Microinstability

TypeinterventionalSponsorRAUL FIGA BARRIOSRan2020 to 2024Enrolled71ConditionsLateral Ligament, Ankle, Cartilage, ArticularArmsArthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair, Talar chondral lesion treatment using microfracture technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raúl Figa BarriosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. rfigab@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-126X
José María Mora-GuixDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-6871
Pablo Oscar Roza MiguelMBA Institute Chair for Biomechanical and Medical Research, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7060-136X
Jesús Vila-RicoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-0109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of chondral lesions in patients with chronic ankle instability is common and has been suggested as a possible cause of persistent pain in some cases, even after successful ligament reconstruction. For this reason, some authors have proposed combining ankle stabilization with cartilage microfracture; however, the results reported in literature are contradictory. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was designed as a prospective randomized clinical study with two parallel arms. Patients with an anterior talofibular ligament tear causing pain and instability, associated with a Berndt-Harty stage I-IIb talar osteochondral lesion of < 150 mm

resultsA total of 71 patients were included in the study, with 36 in the REC group and 35 in the REC + MIC group. The groups were comparable in terms of anthropometry and pathology. The operating time was significantly longer in the REC + MIC group (48.0 ± 4.5 min) compared with the REC group (24.9 ± 3.9 min; p < 0.001). At the end of follow-up, both patient groups showed similar results on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score (p = 0.755), Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) (p = 0.862), Karlsson score (p = 0.993), and visual analog scale (VAS) (p = 0.870). However, the time to recovery differed between the groups, with patients in the REC group recovering faster from before the operation (pre-op) through the third month after the operation (post-op). The difference in recovery at 3 months post-op was statistically significant on the AOFAS (p < 0.001), SEFAS (p < 0.001), and Karlsson (p < 0.001) scores. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of pain (p = 0.342). The failure rate was also comparable between the groups, with four (11.1%) reoperations in the REC group and five (14.3%) in the REC + MIC group (p = 0.735).

conclusionsAt 2 years post surgery, no differences were observed in function (according to the AOFAS, SEFAS, and Karlsson scores), pain, or complications in patients with ankle instability and associated chondral damage treated with or without microfractures. However, patients who underwent microfractures experienced a significantly slower recovery of function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06947317 (retrospectively registered). Date: 1 May 2025. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06947317 ).

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesAnkle JointArthroplasty, SubchondralCartilage, ArticularJoint InstabilityLateral Ligament, AnkleAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnkleAnkle injuriesAnkle jointArthroscopyCartilage diseasesJoint instabilityLateral ligamentOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialSubchondral

Identifiers

PMID41065921
PMCPMC12511473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.