ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2025
Hypophosphatasia and Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study and Review of Literature.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewHypophosphatasia (HPP) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) are both associated with low bone turnover and increased fracture risk. In this review, our objectives were to (a) discuss results of our pilot study aimed to evaluate prevalence and clinical and radiological characteristics of HPP in adults with T1D and (b) to review literature on the use of electronic medical records (EMR) for HPP case findings. RECENT
findingsIn our pilot study, 18 individuals had persistent low alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP) [18/1723, 1.05%]. Among 10 participants who completed the study with potential HPP and T1D, three had a pathogenic ALPL mutation (0.16% prevalence), and six had elevated serum vitamin B6. No significant differences were found in DXA-based bone density, QCT-based bone density, or Finite element-estimated bone strength between the potential HPP group, T1D adults, and controls. We did not find any study that evaluated persistent low ALP levels or potential HPP in patients with diabetes (either type 1 or type 2 diabetes). The literature reported higher prevalence of low ALP levels when electronic medical records were searched (~ 1-3%). However, prevalence of suspected HPP based on persistent low ALP levels and/or clinical signs and symptoms was around 0.5% or lower depending on sample size, methods and geographical locations. Our study suggests that EMR-based screening for HPP is feasible and may identify previously undiagnosed cases of HPP. Prevalence of potential HPP in T1D is around 1% and genetically confirmed HPP is 0.16% which is similar to reported prevalence of HPP in selected population without diabetes. Skeletal imaging and clinical presentations are not sufficient for identifying potential HPP in individuals with T1D. Given the increased fracture risk and low bone turnover typically seen in T1D, we propose that an EMR-based screening strategy could be a more effective approach for diagnosing HPP in T1D population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.