Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065899›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Outcomes of anterior component separation versus posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release for large incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ali Yasen Mohamedahmed, Mohamed Talaat Issa, Shafquat Zaman, Safeya Mohammed, Marwa Yassin Mohamedahmed, Mohammed Hamid, A K Ali Muhammed, Stephen Odogwu, Syed Adnan Kabir

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali Yasen Mohamedahmed *Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-7571
Mohamed Talaat Issa *Department of General Surgery, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8426-4462
Shafquat ZamanCollege of Medical and Dental Science, School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. s.zaman@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-8289
Safeya MohammedDepartment of General Surgery, Ibrahim Malik Teaching Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan.
Marwa Yassin MohamedahmedDepartment of General Surgery, Atbara Teaching Hospital, Atbara, Sudan.
Mohammed HamidDepartment of General Surgery, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
A K Ali MuhammedDepartment of General Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Stephen OdogwuDepartment of General Surgery, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
Syed Adnan KabirDepartment of General Surgery, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge incisional hernias (IHs), especially with loss of domain, pose significant challenges for repair. Component separation, as a method of repair, allows for adequate coverage of large hernial defects. We compared outcomes of anterior component separation (ACS) versus posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (PCSTAR) in the repair of large IHs.

methodsA systematic search of various electronic databases was conducted to identify studies (published between January 1990 - June 2025) comparing ACS and PCSTAR performed for IH repair. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias (RoB) using validated tools appropriate to study design (Cochrane RoB for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), MINORS for non-randomised studies). Our evaluated outcome measures included overall wound complications, surgical site infections (SSI), hematoma and seroma formation, total operative time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and recurrence rate. Data were analysed using RevMan 5.3, employing a random-effects model.

resultsA total of eight studies (three RCTs and five observational studies) with 2293 patients (1573 with ACS and 720 with PCSTAR) were included. The PCSTAR group demonstrated a lower rate of overall wound complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, P = 0.004) and SSIs (OR 1.72, P = 0.05) compared with the ACS group. No significant differences were observed for hematoma (OR 0.87, P = 0.51) or seroma formation (OR 1.77, P = 0.11), recurrence rate (OR 1.81, P = 0.31), operative time (mean difference [MD] -6.57, P = 0.77), or LOS (MD -0.67, P = 0.16) between the two groups. Overall, RCTs demonstrated a low risk of bias in most domains, whilst non-randomised studies showed moderate methodological quality.

conclusionBoth component separation techniques demonstrated comparable outcomes and efficacy in the repair of large incisional ventral hernias (IVHs). However, PCSTAR seems to be associated with reduced overall wound complications and SSI rates. A small number of included RCTs mandate that further adequately powered, well-designed RCTs are required to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment OutcomeComponent separationIncisional herniaMeta-analysisSystematic reviewTAR release

Identifiers

PMID41065899
PMCPMC12511176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.