ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A head-mounted mixed reality platform for robotic flexible endoscope control in minimally invasive cholecystectomy: an animal feasibility study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immersive head-mounted control of a robotic laparoscopic camera: a usability and accuracy evaluation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic surgical systems have advanced minimally invasive surgery by enhancing dexterity and precision, yet endoscopic camera control remains a persistent bottleneck due to reliance on assistants or manual manipulation that disrupts workflow continuity. We developed MicroVision, a robotic endoscopic platform that translates natural head movements into real-time viewpoint adjustments through a head-mounted mixed reality interface. The system integrates a flexible binocular endoscope with six degrees of freedom and a position-orientation decoupled design, enabling intuitive orientation control and stable, high-definition visualization even in confined anatomical spaces. In a porcine cholecystectomy model (n = 10), MicroVision was compared with conventional laparoscopy. Verbal instructions to camera assistants were almost eliminated, dropping from 15.3 to 0.2 per procedure (P < 0.001), and mean operative time was reduced from 74.8 to 66.0 min (P = 0.038). Camera movements decreased by more than 70%, and intraoperative blood loss was reduced by nearly one quarter. All procedures were completed successfully without complications or system failures. These findings demonstrate that MicroVision enhances surgical efficiency, visualization, and workflow reliability while maintaining established safety standards, underscoring its potential contribution to robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41065898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.