ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Calcified Nodules: Pathology, Mechanisms, and Clinical Challenges.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intravascular lithotripsy for recurrent restenosis caused by a calcified nodule in a saphenous vein graft: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCalcified nodules (CNs) account for ~ 5% of acute coronary syndrome cases. Although the progression of calcification generally leads to plaque stability, CNs ─ an advanced form of calcified plaques ─ can trigger coronary thrombosis and sudden cardiac death. RECENT
findingsCNs are histologically defined as lesions with fibrous cap disruption and luminal thrombus, associated with dense, eruptive calcific nodules protruding into the lumen. They are linked to poor prognosis both post percutaneous coronary intervention and in non-culprit lesions. Interventionalists are exploring various treatment strategies using debulking devices and drug-coated balloons; however, no effective treatment has been established. While histological classifications can be inferred from optical coherence tomography findings, accurately predicting CNs from intravascular imaging remains challenging. This review discusses the pathological features, etiology, clinical outcomes, and current treatment strategies for CNs, offering valuable insights into the correlation and discrepancies between histological findings and optical coherence tomography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41065889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.