ArticleDiscover oncology2025
SMAD4 mutation drives gut microbiome shifts toward tumor progression in colorectal cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbial metabolites in colorectal cancer: dual roles in tumorigenesis, immune crosstalk, and therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Assessment of the relationship between gut microbiota, inflammatory markers, and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) progression is driven by a series of sequential mutations in key driver genes; however, the factors underlying tumor progression and metastasis remain poorly understood. Mutations in TP53 and SMAD4, in particular, are associated with CRC progression. Although gut microbiome dysbiosis is implicated in CRC initiation and progression, the interactions between the microbiome and specific CRC driver mutations, especially those promoting metastasis, are not well defined.
methodsIn this study, we utilized triple mutant (Apc, Kras, Tp53; AKP) and quadruple mutant (Apc, Kras, Tp53, Smad4; AKPS) organoid-based orthotopic mouse models of CRC to investigate the impact of the SMAD4 mutation on microbiome composition.
resultsOur results reveal significant differences in metastatic potential and microbial community dynamics between the two tumor models. AKPS tumors exhibited metastasis to the lymph nodes, liver, and lungs, while AKP tumors remained confined to the colon. Longitudinal microbiome analysis showed shifts in microbial composition within each tumor model. Both AKP and AKPS models demonstrated enrichment of Faecalibaculum and a decrease in Dubosiella over time; however, additional shifts were noted with distinct taxa associated with late-stage tumors in each group. Notably, the AKPS model exhibited higher relative abundances of pro-inflammatory taxa, including Turicibacter, Romboutsia, and Akkermansia, suggesting that the SMAD4 mutation promotes a more immunosuppressive and pro-metastatic microbiome profile.
conclusionsThese findings emphasize the significance of SMAD4 mutation and microbiome modulation, revealing the interaction between host genetics and gut microbiota in driving colorectal cancer aggressiveness and suggesting potential microbial targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.