Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065871›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Genetic evaluation of sudden unexpected death in infants and children.

A M Pries, S N van der Crabben, H A Moll, W P Te Rijdt, K T Verbruggen, P J Puiman, PESUDIC collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A M PriesDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molenwaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S N van der CrabbenDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H A MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molenwaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
W P Te RijdtDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
K T VerbruggenDepartment of General Paediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
P J PuimanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molenwaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. p.puiman@erasmusmc.nl.
PESUDIC collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dutch Postmortem Evaluation of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infants and Children (PESUDIC) procedure investigates cases of sudden unexpected death in infants and children (SUDI and SUDC). These deaths may have a genetic basis. This national retrospective study examined the yield of genetic testing in PESUDIC cases to provide recommendations for genetic evaluation of SUDI and SUDC. Children who underwent the PESUDIC procedure from 2016 to 2022 and had genetic testing performed were included. They were categorized into three groups: (A) cases where standard PESUDIC investigations yielded contributive findings; (B) cases with no contributive findings from standard investigations, but with comorbidities present; (C) cases without contributive findings from standard investigations or comorbidities. The indication and type of genetic testing were determined based on differential diagnostic considerations. Standardized data on medical history, postmortem diagnostic outcomes, and genetic testing outcomes were collected. Genetic testing was performed in 102 cases (median age 1.1 years, 52% male). Prevalence of (likely) pathogenic (LP/P) variants was 20% in group A (n = 66), 27% in group B (n = 11), and 28% in group C (n = 25). In 13 out of these 20 cases, these variants were considered contributive to the cause of death, involving both cardiac (8%) and non-cardiac pathways (5%).

conclusionWe found a high diagnostic yield from genetic testing in cases of SUDI and SUDC, particularly when routine postmortem examination failed to identify a cause of death. These findings support the usefulness of comprehensive genetic evaluation in cases of unexpected paediatric death. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Previous studies have identified both cardiac and non-cardiac genetic causes of death for cases with pediatric sudden death. • Identifying a genetic cause can have profound implications for family members, such as enabling targeted surveillance and preventive interventions for at-risk family members and informing reproductive decision-making. WHAT IS NEW: • Genetic evaluation of infants and children with sudden unexpected death has a high diagnostic yield, especially when routine postmortem examinations did not identify a cause of death. • In a comprehensive postmortem investigation of sudden pediatric death broad genetic testing involving both cardiac and noncardiac pathways should be considered.

Indexed as

Death, SuddenGenetic TestingSudden Infant DeathAutopsyCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesChild death reviewMolecular autopsyPostmortemSIDSSUDCSUDISUDY

Identifiers

PMID41065871
PMCPMC12511225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.