Observational studyNeurosurgical review2025
Reducing medication errors in neurosurgery through clinical pharmacy interventions: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care interventions amid pharmacist role transformation in China: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgical patient care is inherently complex, characterized by high rates of polypharmacy, advanced age, and significant comorbidities, all of which increase the risk of medication errors. These challenges are compounded by dynamic treatment plans and intensive care demands. In response, clinical pharmacist-led "pharmaceutical interventions" have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance medication safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a structured weekly pharmacist-led medication review programme on prescribing practices and patient outcomes in a tertiary academic neurosurgical department. In this 12-month prospective study, a pharmacist performed weekly medication reviews on the neurosurgical ward and HDU. Interventions were coded in ADKA-DokuPIK and relayed to the team; 10% were re-audited to confirm uptake. The year was split into two six-month epochs to assess temporal trends. Administrative data from the intervention year were compared with a historical control for length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Adverse-drug-event rates were not prospectively collected. A total of 996 interventions were documented among 1795 patients (0.55/patient). Intervention rates declined from 0.7 to 0.4 per patient between periods (p = 0.016), suggesting a learning effect. Implementation of recommendations was confirmed in 78% of audited cases. The most commonly affected drugs were pantoprazole (n = 77), amlodipine (n = 47), ciprofloxacin (n = 44). Median LOS decreased from 8.1 to 7.3 days (p = 0.032), the proportion of prolonged hospitalisations (> 14 days) fell from 18.9% to 14.8% (p = 0.002), and in-hospital mortality declined from 4.6% to 3.0% (p = 0.014). Routine integration of a clinical pharmacist into neurosurgical care was associated with fewer medication-related issues, measurable improvements in LOS and mortality, and evidence of progressive prescriber adaptation. These findings support broader implementation of pharmacist-led interventions in high-risk surgical environments. Controlled multicenter trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.