Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065857›Full record

Observational studyNeurosurgical review2025

Reducing medication errors in neurosurgery through clinical pharmacy interventions: a prospective observational study.

Aaron Lawson McLean, Anna Schlattl, Christian Senft, Michael Hartmann, Falko Schwarz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aaron Lawson McLeanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. aaron.lawsonmclean@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-6905
Anna SchlattlHospital Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christian SenftDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-6913
Michael HartmannHospital Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-4540
Falko SchwarzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-193X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurosurgical patient care is inherently complex, characterized by high rates of polypharmacy, advanced age, and significant comorbidities, all of which increase the risk of medication errors. These challenges are compounded by dynamic treatment plans and intensive care demands. In response, clinical pharmacist-led "pharmaceutical interventions" have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance medication safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a structured weekly pharmacist-led medication review programme on prescribing practices and patient outcomes in a tertiary academic neurosurgical department. In this 12-month prospective study, a pharmacist performed weekly medication reviews on the neurosurgical ward and HDU. Interventions were coded in ADKA-DokuPIK and relayed to the team; 10% were re-audited to confirm uptake. The year was split into two six-month epochs to assess temporal trends. Administrative data from the intervention year were compared with a historical control for length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Adverse-drug-event rates were not prospectively collected. A total of 996 interventions were documented among 1795 patients (0.55/patient). Intervention rates declined from 0.7 to 0.4 per patient between periods (p = 0.016), suggesting a learning effect. Implementation of recommendations was confirmed in 78% of audited cases. The most commonly affected drugs were pantoprazole (n = 77), amlodipine (n = 47), ciprofloxacin (n = 44). Median LOS decreased from 8.1 to 7.3 days (p = 0.032), the proportion of prolonged hospitalisations (> 14 days) fell from 18.9% to 14.8% (p = 0.002), and in-hospital mortality declined from 4.6% to 3.0% (p = 0.014). Routine integration of a clinical pharmacist into neurosurgical care was associated with fewer medication-related issues, measurable improvements in LOS and mortality, and evidence of progressive prescriber adaptation. These findings support broader implementation of pharmacist-led interventions in high-risk surgical environments. Controlled multicenter trials are warranted.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalAdultAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesClinical PharmacyDrug SafetyMedication ErrorsNeurosurgeryPatient SafetyPharmacist Interventions

Identifiers

PMID41065857
PMCPMC12511136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.