ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Bacteriophages as a modern diagnostic tool: innovations, applications and challenges.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation, characterization, and antibacterial activity of a novel Pasteurella multocida bacteriophage.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Evolving Approaches to Bacterial Identification: A Review of Classical and Modern Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative Methodological Evaluation of Three Bacteriophage Isolation Methods From Environmental Water Samples.Cureus · 2026Article
- Isolation and Characterization of a New Bacteriophage: Host Range Assessment and Prospects of Use in the Identification of Moraxella spp.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Bacteriophages as Antibacterial Agents Against Bovine Pathobionts Associated with Foodborne Human Morbidity.Viruses · 2026Review
- Phage amplification-coupled CRISPR/Cas12a system for selective detection of viableFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteriophages, viruses that specifically infect bacteria, have emerged as a valuable tool in diagnostics due to their unique specificity and adaptability. This review explores the diverse applications of bacteriophages in diagnostic methods, from traditional phage typing to advanced molecular techniques such as phage display and PCR-based diagnostics. It highlights their use in identifying bacterial strains, monitoring fermentation processes, and diagnosing critical conditions like tuberculosis, MRSA infections, and cancer. Innovations such as phage-based biosensors and reporter phages enhance the speed and precision of diagnostics, offering significant advantages over traditional methods. Challenges, including bacterial resistance and immune responses to phages, are also discussed alongside strategies for mitigation, such as phage cocktails and engineering. Integrating phage technology with modern bioscience holds promise for addressing antibiotic resistance and revolutionizing clinical and industrial diagnostics. This comprehensive analysis underscores the potential of bacteriophages to transform the diagnostic landscape while identifying areas requiring further research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.