ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Evaluating and communicating probability of acute cholecystitis consistently using a data-derived risk stratification algorithm synthesizing ultrasound and clinical parameters.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sonographic diagnosis of acute cholecystitis presents challenges. In our practice, we enhance diagnostic accuracy by determining a patient's risk of acute cholecystitis using four non-image parameters and five imaging parameters. The non-image risk assessment is based on patient age, sex, leukocytosis, and the presence of a sonographic Murphy sign. The imaging risk stratification is derived from evaluating gallbladder (GB) distention, GB wall thickness, GB contents, pericholecystic irregular collections, and hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (HAv). By applying a standardized scoring framework, patients are stratified into one of four diagnostic categories for acute cholecystitis: (1) practically excluded (< 1% probability); (2) reduced risk (< 10% probability); (3) elevated risk (25-30% probability); (4) substantially elevated risk (with three subgroups having 50%, 75%, and 90% probability). This review outlines the methodology of our approach, provides supporting data from published cohorts, and explains the macro-enabled Excel tool we use to streamline the analysis. This tool generates standardized report and impression statements that can be directly incorporated into radiology reporting templates. The approach promotes consistency in reporting, particularly amongst trainees formulating preliminary interpretations, and offers consistent evidence-based probability estimates to emergency department physicians and surgeons for clinical decision-making using a framework that eliminates indeterminate assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41065826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.