ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Examining the impact of adolescent social isolation on oxycodone sensitization.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleChronic stress and social isolation during adolescence can disrupt normal development and increase substance use behaviors in adulthood.
objectivesThe impact of adolescent social isolation stress on stimulant behaviors has been identified in a mouse model. The impact of adolescent social isolation on opioid behaviors is less clear. We assess the effect of adolescent social isolation on oxycodone sensitization across sexes and light phase.
methodsMice were either group-housed or socially isolated at weaning and remained in these housing conditions until adulthood. Male and female mice in both housing conditions received 5 days of daily injections of oxycodone (5 mg/kg) during either the light or dark phase. A subset of mice remained in their home cage for five additional days prior to a final oxycodone challenge.
resultsWhen tested during the light phase male mice in both housing conditions exhibit oxycodone sensitization to a 5 mg/kg dose, while female mice do not. In contrast, when tested during the dark phase, none of the groups exhibit oxycodone sensitization. In fact, female mice develop tolerance to the locomotor activating effects of oxycodone after five daily injections. Following five days in the home cage, group housed females continued to exhibit tolerance to the locomotor effects of oxycodone, while socially isolated females do not. Additionally, socially isolated females exhibit a larger conditioned response to the arena during the habituation phase than animals in any of the other groups.
conclusionsSensitization is a light phase dependent process in male mice. Female mice do not sensitize to 5 mg/kg oxycodone. Adolescent social isolation stress influences the development of tolerance, not sensitization. Oxycodone induces sex-specific effects on locomotion during habituation phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.