ArticleExperimental brain research2025
The role of working memory capacity on the neural mechanisms of mind wandering in drilling crews.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mind wandering in the workplace often causes work errors and may trigger accidents, but there is a lack of clarity about the effects of working memory capacity on the neural mechanisms of mind wandering in drilling crews. Therefore, to determine the effects of different working memory capacities on mind wandering and to explore the neural mechanisms behind these effects, the present study was conducted with drilling crews from an actual drilling site. Participants were grouped based on their performance on the N-back task, and EEG data were collected during the SART task. The behavioral results showed that there were no significant differences in response time and accuracy between groups with different working memory capacities. The EEG results showed that the P3 amplitude during mind wandering was significantly larger in the group with high working memory capacity than in the group with low working memory capacity. Furthermore, there were significant differences in δ, θ, and α-band oscillatory power between the groups with high and low working memory capacities, suggesting the effects of attentional allocation of resources and executive control functions on mind wandering. These results highlight the influence of different working memory capacities on the neural mechanisms of mind wandering. The findings of this study offer novel evidence regarding the role of working memory capacity in the neural mechanisms underlying mind wandering and are expected to inform the development of vocational training programs and cognitive intervention strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41065803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.