ReviewClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026
Calvarial Bloom Biomechanics: Dural Tension Governing Cranial Form.
Review in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calvarial Bloom Biomechanics: Dural Tension Governing Cranial Form.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Calvarial Blooming Model (CBM) describes cranial vault growth as a Class III lever system in which patterned brain expansion supplies the effort, dural tethers act as fulcra, and sutures serve as load-transfer zones. In contrast to models emphasizing muscular loading or genetic determinism, CBM frames the cranium as a compliant, tension-sensitive structure shaped by cerebral growth, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) buoyancy, and intracranial pulsations. Evidence from multiple sources was used to illustrate the framework. Bolton Standards cephalometric superimpositions (ages 6-18) provided conservative estimates of sutural displacement and vault surface area expansion. Cases from the AAOF Legacy Collection demonstrated late-phase remodeling often absent in standard datasets. Published finite-element analyses of sutural strain and dural tension pathways, together with clinical and histological observations, further supported the model. Perturbations of genetic and environmental regulators-including RUNX2, FGFRs, and BMPs-disrupt these strain pathways and produce craniofacial anomalies consistent with CBM predictions. Recognizing cranial vault expansion as the action of a tensioned dural hammock operating under Class III lever mechanics clarifies how patterned brain growth directs vault remodeling and suggests new approaches to craniosynostosis correction and growth modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.