ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Integration of Visual Motion Signals in Reduced Visual Conditions.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Neural sensory systems continuously tailor themselves to adapt to changes in the surrounding environment. In motion adaptation, a certain period of exposure to consistent motion in one direction (inducer) will alter the perceived direction of motion of the following stimulus. Depending on the timescale of the inducer, two opposite adaptation phenomena can be observed: motion priming for brief inducers, and motion aftereffect for longer inducers. The aim of this study was to investigate how the integration of motion signals during adaptation is affected by externally reduced visual conditions, such as luminance, contrast, and spatial frequency. We then considered how this would apply to the naturally impaired visual system in amblyopia. Methods: We addressed this question by taking advantage of a visual illusion, the High-phi illusion. We measured the High-phi transition point when manipulating the visual conditions (contrast and luminance), the targeted subpopulations of neurons (by varying spatial frequency), and the integration properties of the visual system by changing the viewing conditions (monocular viewing, binocular viewing, and testing amblyopic participants). Results: We found a larger transition point under high spatial frequency, low luminance, low contrast, and monocular viewing conditions. We then propose a model of temporal integration, for the motion signals, that accurately describes those effects. Conclusions: Finally, we validated our model by testing amblyopic participants and demonstrating that the amblyopic visual system exhibits a larger High-phi transition point, thereby characterizing slower temporal integration. Overall, our results show that the integration of visual motion energy could switch adaptation from priming to aftereffect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.