Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065462›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Optimizing colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening by low-barrier, low-threshold pretesting.

Thomas Heisser, Rafael Cardoso, Tobias Niedermaier, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas HeisserDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-3350
Rafael CardosoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias NiedermaierDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael HoffmeisterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-3197
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-1572

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GL1712Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KD2104ADeutsche Krebshilfe 70114735Deutsche Krebshilfe 70115864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Gateopener' colonoscopy-based screening is an innovative concept to better target colonoscopy to those who are most likely to benefit from it. It combines invitations to screening colonoscopy with the offer of pretesting with a single 'gateopener' fecal immunochemical test (FIT) which is applied with a lower positivity threshold than in conventional FIT-based screening. We explored optimized use of this approach for reducing CRC incidence and mortality. Using COSIMO, a previously validated simulation tool, we compared outcomes of gateopener screening to those of conventional FIT- or colonoscopy-based screening strategies. Gateopener screening was modelled using SENTiFIT-FOB Gold as exemplary 'gateopener' FIT at various low hemoglobin cut-offs (10, 8, 6, 4, and 3 μg/g feces). We found that Gateopener screening at cut-offs of 6, 4, or 3 μg/g outperformed conventional screening colonoscopy in terms of CRC incidence reduction, with 16%-25%, 50%-57%, and 66%-72% more prevented cases, respectively, after 10 years. All gateopener scenarios significantly increased prevented deaths, at low cut-offs more than doubling the numbers achieved by conventional screening colonoscopy. Compared to biennial FIT, gateopener screening prevented 7%-163% more cases, with lower cut-offs associated with higher gains, and prevented approximately equal to significantly more (12%-21%) CRC deaths. Cut-offs of 10 and 8 μg/g required fewer colonoscopies per prevented case and death. Gateopener screening outperforms conventional CRC screening by offering considerably stronger reduction of CRC incidence and mortality rates as well as considerably increased screening effectiveness. The feasibility of the concept should be assessed by a pilot study in real-life practice.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedFecesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult Bloodcolonoscopycolorectal cancerfecal immunochemical testingmodellingscreening

Identifiers

PMID41065462
PMCPMC12811201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.