ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of disk diffusion and microscan versus broth microdilution methods for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of EUCAST RAST and QuickMIC for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistant organisms directly from positive blood cultures.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- [Advances in integrated antimicrobial resistance diagnostics: quantitative, qualitative and AI-driven approaches].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- End-to-End Timeliness of Blood Culture Diagnostics: A One-Month Observational Study of 5121 Bottles.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Single-center clinical laboratory evaluation of VITEK REVEAL for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative organisms directly from positive blood cultures.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The impact of multicenter microbiology laboratory workflow optimization on antimicrobial susceptibility testing reporting time and outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in Gram-negative (GN) bloodstream infections is critical to guide appropriate therapy. This study evaluated three rapid AST (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, direct-from-blood-culture VITEK 2 (VITEK 2-RAST), and EUCAST disk diffusion (DD-RAST)-using 220 prospectively collected GN-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). A total of 18 GN species were tested, including IMPORTANCE: This study is the first to conduct a direct comparison of three rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, VITEK 2-RAST, and DD-RAST-on a large, prospectively collected cohort of Gram-negative-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). The data offer valuable insights for laboratories evaluating RAST implementation, especially in EUCAST-based contexts. Among the systems tested, VITEK REVEAL stood out for its combination of rapid turnaround and high accuracy, including for antibiotic-resistant organisms and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. These findings underscore the potential of RAST systems to deliver timely and reliable susceptibility results directly from GN-PBCs, thereby supporting more effective antimicrobial stewardship and clinical decision-making. However, the real-world impact will also depend on how well these systems integrate into routine workflows, as seamless implementation can directly affect time-to-result (TTR)-an essential element in optimizing the management of GN-bloodstream infection (BSI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.