ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2026
The impact of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among families and caregivers: A qualitative analysis of responses to a public consultation on newborn screening in the UK.
Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communicating a Congenital Cytomegalovirus Diagnosis: Parent Experiences and a Clinical Framework.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- The Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in an Era of Universal Newborn CMV Screening.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo describe the impact associated with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection and experiences and perceptions of people with experience of CMV in pregnancy and families / caregivers of children diagnosed with cCMV, who responded to a UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) public consultation on cCMV screening.MethodsThe public consultation was conducted in 2021-22 on a draft evidence review and was aimed at informing the UK NSC's decision on newborn screening for cCMV. Data were analysed using framework analysis: a subgroup of responses was inductively coded, codes were refined and initial themes identified, before targeted coding of the remainder of the data and identification of final themes and sub-themes.ResultsOf a total 155 responses, 125 (describing 128 pregnancy/child outcomes) contained information relevant to the coding framework and were included. Most (n = 109) described a live birth of a surviving child, of whom 90% (98/109) were living with symptoms or long-term sequelae of cCMV at the time of the response. Two main themes were identified: missed opportunities and emotional impacts attributed by respondents to not screening for cCMV. Many families described delays in their child's cCMV diagnosis, including due to healthcare professionals' lack of awareness of cCMV, and viewed newborn screening as a solution to avoid delays in diagnostic pathways. Diagnostic delays resulted in a lasting sense of injustice and unfairness due to possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes (e.g., through antiviral treatment or early therapies), as well as uncertainty and anxiety.ConclusionsResponses were predominantly from parents and caregivers of children with cCMV who experienced long term disability. They highlight significant gaps in awareness, support and health care for affected children that need addressing, regardless of national screening policy decisions. These responses contribute to the literature on lived experiences of individuals and families affected by cCMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.