ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025
Coupling and decoupling of the cell cycle from cell differentiation in development.
Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over a century, biologists have examined how the cell cycle and differentiation influence one another. While it is well established that cell fate decisions can regulate the cell cycle, the reciprocal effect of the cycle on differentiation remains more contentious. Here, we review mechanisms by which cell cycle events can influence differentiation in animals, but focus primarily on the widespread evidence that these processes are often uncoupled. Erythropoiesis provides a rare example where S-phase progression appears to be strictly required for a key commitment step across different species, whereas many other tissues differentiate normally despite complete arrest of cell division. We propose that decoupling cell cycle progression from differentiation enables independent control of tissue size and cell size and allows the cell cycle to tune progenitor numbers in response to physiological and evolutionary demands. Advances in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics now allow systematic assessment of coupling across tissues and developmental stages, and can disentangle genuine dependencies from stress responses induced by classical cell cycle inhibitors. Division and differentiation interact through multiple molecular pathways, but buffering these interactions to maintain weak or no coupling may be essential for adapting developmental processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.