Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41065128›Full record

ReviewJournal of primary care & community health

Framework to Launching a Community Eye Clinic.

Maythita Eiampikul, Bryce St Clair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maythita EiampikulJohns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5415-7941
Bryce St ClairJohns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-1772-9789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCommunity eye clinics play a key role in referring patients for specialized care and conducting epidemiological studies, particularly among vulnerable and financially disadvantaged populations. However, there is a lack of published frameworks detailing the specific steps required to establish and sustain these clinics. This paper addresses the gap by outlining essential considerations for launching a community-based eye clinic.

methodsA comprehensive review of existing eye care delivery models was conducted. Documents from established free or low-cost clinics were analyzed to identify common challenges, effective strategies, and legal requirements. Real-world insights on clinic implementation, staffing, patient outreach, and sustainability were obtained through informal discussions with eye care providers and healthcare administrators.

resultsFindings were synthesized into a step-by-step framework to guide providers and organizations in developing a community eye clinic. Key steps include identifying and engaging stakeholders, establishing clinic operations, ensuring long-term sustainability, implementing referral and follow-up systems, addressing legal and regulatory requirements, and promoting the clinic to the target population.

conclusionsThis framework offers a practical guideline to influence practice patterns, enhance health equity, and inform policies aimed at reducing preventable blindness on both local and global scales.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesCommunity Health ServicesEye DiseasesOphthalmologyHumansReferral and Consultationcommunity healthframeworkhealth inequitiesophthalmologyoptometrypublic healthunderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID41065128
PMCPMC12515283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.