ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
Relational Coordination in Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Theoretical Analysis of Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives Between Mental Health Centres and Municipalities.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relational Coordination in Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Theoretical Analysis of Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives Between Mental Health Centres and Municipalities.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective cross-sector collaboration between mental health centres and municipalities is crucial for integrated mental health care. Challenges such as fragmented communication and misaligned goals often impede these efforts. This study explores healthcare professionals' perspectives on these challenges and examines the role of relational coordination in enhancing collaboration.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using focus group interviews with 21 healthcare professionals including nurses, occupational therapists, peer workers and social workers at a major mental health centre in Region Zealand, Denmark. Data were analysed using a hermeneutic approach guided by Jody Hoffer Gittell's relational coordination theory, which emphasises shared goals, shared knowledge, mutual respect and effective communication.
resultsThe study identified significant challenges in cross-sector collaboration, primarily due to poor communication and lack of shared goals between mental health centres and municipalities. These issues led to fragmented care and frequent readmissions. While mutual respect and a person-centered approach were valued, persistent gaps in shared knowledge and role understanding hindered effective collaboration. DISCUSSION: Enhancing communication, aligning goals and strengthening relational coordination are critical for improving cross-sector collaboration. Addressing these challenges requires targeted interventions such as systematic communication protocols, regular interdisciplinary meetings and clearer role definitions, supported by policy initiatives.
conclusionImproving relational coordination between mental health centres and municipalities is essential for providing integrated, continuous mental health care. Focusing on shared goals, mutual respect and effective communication can enhance collaboration and lead to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.