Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064928›Full record

ArticlePain management2025

Psychological flexibility and stigma in chronic pain: a cross-sectional study of healthcare professionals in the UK.

Alan Robert Bowman, Laura May Room

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan Robert BowmanDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-6640
Laura May RoomDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHealthcare professionals' attitudes toward chronic pain patients can contribute to stigma, affecting care and patient outcomes. This study examined whether psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between stigma vulnerability (i.e. patient characteristics that invite stigma) and enacted stigma (i.e. discriminatory behaviors) among healthcare professionals. PARTICIPANTS &

methodsA cross-sectional study recruited 239 National Health Service (NHS) staff from six UK NHS Trusts. Participants were randomly assigned one of four vignettes manipulating patient stigma vulnerability (high vs. low) and gender. Enacted stigma outcomes (e.g. perceived deception, pain attribution) were assessed via Likert scales. Psychological flexibility and inflexibility were measured using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S). Robust ANOVA tested main effects and moderation.

resultsPsychological flexibility did not significantly moderate the stigma vulnerability - enacted stigma relationship (

conclusionsPsychological inflexibility plays a role in stigma-related behaviors and may be a target for interventions to reduce healthcare provider bias in chronic pain care. Further research is needed to examine these mechanisms and their implications.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChronic PainCognitive FlexibilityHealth PersonnelSocial StigmaAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementStereotypingUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41064928
PMCPMC12674394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.