Trial reportAllergy2025
SQ House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Children With Allergic Asthma: A Randomised Phase III Trial.
Trial report in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03654976 (A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet in Children and Adolescents (5-17 Years) With HDM Allergic Asthma
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- World Allergy Organization Sublingual Immunotherapy Position Paper: 2026 update:The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Review
- How to Employ Trained Immunity and Trained Immunity-Based Vaccines to Inhibit Allergic Inflammation.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Sublingual allergen immunotherapy: evidence from randomized trials, real-world studies and meta-analyses.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn children, house dust mite (HDM) sensitisation is a contributing factor for developing allergic asthma. HDM allergen immunotherapy has demonstrated efficacy and safety in adults with allergic asthma; however, evidence for its use in children is limited. MT-11 evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SQ HDM sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet in children (5-17 years) with HDM allergic asthma.
methodsThis phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomised 533 children with a recent history of asthma exacerbations, despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and/or long-acting beta-agonists, to daily treatment with SQ HDM SLIT-tablet or placebo for 24-30 months. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations. Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the trial.
resultsThe rate ratio for the annualised rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.60, 1.31), in favour of the SQ HDM-SLIT tablet; superiority over placebo was not established. Most treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were of mild or moderate severity, and few subjects discontinued due to TRAEs (< 2%). The most common TRAEs were local application site reactions (oral pruritus, throat irritation, ear pruritus, and upper abdominal pain). There was no increased incidence of asthma-related events, and no anaphylaxis or adrenaline use in the SQ HDM SLIT-tablet group.
conclusionAs a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, asthma exacerbation rates were much lower than expected, contributing to the primary endpoint not being met. The SQ HDM SLIT-tablet was well tolerated in a paediatric population with inadequately controlled HDM allergic asthma.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03654976; EudraCT number: 2016-004363-39.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.