ArticleThe FEBS journal2026
Exploring the influence of lid region residues on fatty acid selectivity in a lipase originating from Rhizopus oryzae.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipases are vital in modifying lipid substrates across industries such as food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. Among their features, fatty acid selectivity is particularly important for industrial applications. Rhizopus oryzae lipase (ROL) stands out for its high selectivity and broad applicability. In this study, we engineered single-residue variants of ROL by targeting Ala89 and Phe95 in its lid region. Additionally, a lid-swap chimera was created by replacing ROL's 15-residue lid with that of the homologous lipase from Rhizomucor miehei (RML). These variants were expressed and characterized to assess changes in substrate selectivity. Our results highlight the lid's key role in determining fatty acid preference. Notably, mutating Phe95 to smaller residues (Ile or Ala) significantly increased selectivity toward medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA) esters. In contrast, substituting Ala89 with bulkier residues (Phe or Trp) reduced activity-except in the lid-swap variant. Interestingly, although the lid-swap variant contains Trp89, the surrounding smaller, non-conserved residues may alleviate steric hindrance. This chimera retained high activity but shifted its preference from MCFAs to long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), a novel observation. Overall, the engineered variants exhibited distinct substrate preferences without compromising thermostability, suggesting their potential for tailored applications in food, nutrition, and cosmetic industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.