Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064845›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Perceptions of antimicrobial use and resistance among pet owners in Chile: A cross-sectional One Health survey.

Nicolás Galarce, Ailén Dumont-Viollaz, José Longa, Leslye Camila Del Río, Andrea Núñez, Byron Guzmán-Marín, Pamela Thomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolás GalarceDepartment of Animal Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Ailén Dumont-ViollazSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Andres Bello University, Santiago, 8370251, Chile.
José LongaSchool of Sociology. Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Silva Henríquez Catholic University, Santiago, 8330225, Chile.
Leslye Camila Del RíoSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Andres Bello University, Santiago, 8370251, Chile.
Andrea NúñezSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Catholic University of Maule, Curicó, 3340000, Chile.
Byron Guzmán-MarínFaculty of Engineering and Sciences, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, 7550344, Chile.
Pamela ThomsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Andres Bello University, Santiago, 8370251, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a critical global health threat, compromising the efficacy of treatments across human, animal, and environmental health domains. While efforts have predominantly focused on livestock and human medicine, the role of pet owners remains underexplored, despite their direct involvement in antimicrobial administration and influence on veterinary decisions. This study aimed to assess perceptions, knowledge, and practices regarding antimicrobial use and resistance among pet owners in Chile, providing a baseline to inform future education and policy initiatives under a One Health framework. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey targeting adult dog and cat owners was conducted from May 19 to 21, 2023, in Santiago, Chile, during a large public pet-focused event. Using a validated questionnaire, data were collected on demographics, pet characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to antibiotics and AMR. A total of 378 valid responses were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were applied to examine associations, particularly between education level and reported practices. Results: Most respondents were female (74.4%) with professional degrees (64%) and aged between 21 and 50 years. Dogs were more commonly owned (73.8%) than cats (26.2%). While 86.2% reported their pet had received antibiotics, only 68.2% recalled veterinarians confirming proper administration understanding. A strong majority agreed that antibiotics should only be used for bacterial infections and opposed acquiring them without a prescription. Notably, 92.4% stated that they would stop treatment early if improvement was observed. Approximately 52% had used human antibiotics for pets, and 38% were open to substituting prescribed veterinary antibiotics with human ones. No significant association was found between education level and antibiotic use behaviors (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Findings reveal important gaps in owner understanding and adherence to antimicrobial guidelines, particularly regarding treatment completion and human antibiotic use in pets. Strengthening veterinarian-owner communication, promoting species-specific antibiotic use, and enhancing awareness of AMR's broader implications are essential. These insights support targeted educational efforts and integration of pet owner perspectives into national AMR strategies to advance One Health goals.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistancecatsChiledogsOne Healthperceptionspet owners

Identifiers

PMID41064845
PMCPMC12501537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.