ArticleNAR cancer2025
Reference-free RNA profiling predicts triple negative breast cancer chemoresistance to neoadjuvant treatment.
Article in NAR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer (BC) and often affects young women. TNBCs are highly heterogeneous and do not benefit from personalized medicine at localized stages. Most TNBC patients undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before surgery. In case of chemoresistance with residual tumor after NAC, survival is poor despite execution of complete tumor resection. There is currently no clinically useful biomarker to predict TNBC chemoresistance to NAC that would enable targeted therapeutic intensification. We analyzed here a unique cohort of 106 TNBC tumors before NAC, including 58 chemoresistant and 48 chemosensitive cases, from 2 independent hospitals. Using machine learning under a nested cross-validation design, we obtained two transcriptomic signatures respectively generated from standard differential gene expression analysis and reference-free analysis of differential fragments of transcripts, without any annotation bias. This approach resulted in accurate signatures of TNBC chemoresistance to NAC. Gene ontology analyses of reference-free signatures highlighted DNA repair, replication, and metabolism, in agreement with current knowledge of TNBC resistance biology. In summary, these results show the potential of a reference-free generated transcriptomic signature as predictive biomarker of early TNBC chemoresistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.