ReviewNAR cancer2025
DNA repair helicases: from mechanistic understanding to therapeutic implications.
Review in NAR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- G-quadruplex structures as regulators of cellular processes and drivers of genome instability in cancer.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Dysregulated HELLS expression alters cellular processes and serves as a potential prognostic marker in acute myeloid leukemia.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Integrating Structural, Biochemical, and Cellular Perspectives on the TFIIH Helicases XPB and XPD.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Targeted CRISPR knockout screening identifies known and novel chemogenomic interactions between DNA damaging agents and DNA repair genes.NAR cancer · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The maintenance of genomic integrity is paramount for normal cell physiology and survival as well as avoidance of carcinogenesis. Cellular DNA is periodically subjected to a myriad of exogenous and endogenous threats and requires constant monitoring to limit genomic instability. To this end, cells possess an intricate DNA damage response and repair (DDR) module comprised of different classes of protein players. The DNA helicases, ATP-dependent enzymes that unwind the DNA double helix, are one such important class of proteins, which act as a linchpin between the recognition and resolution of DNA damage via facilitating various DNA repair processes. Dysfunction or absence of DDR helicase function is implicated in several human disorders including Bloom syndrome, Werner syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, and Fanconi anemia. Somatic helicase mutations or dysregulation of helicase function can also contribute to cancer development, progression, and chemotherapy sensitivity, making helicases a promising target class for chemotherapeutic drug intervention. In addition, recent discoveries have identified some DDR helicases in novel synthetic lethal interactions. In this critical review, we will focus on human DNA helicases that are directly or indirectly involved in DDR with special emphasis on their mechanistic actions and clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.