Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064785›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025

Aldana Quispe-Pillco, Xiomara Bendezú-Quispe, Leonor Castro-Ramirez, Jose Huamani-Echaccaya, José Rosas-Díaz, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, César Cayo-Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aldana Quispe-PillcoSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
Xiomara Bendezú-QuispeSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
Leonor Castro-RamirezSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
Jose Huamani-EchaccayaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
José Rosas-DíazSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
Marysela Ladera-CastañedaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
César Cayo-RojasSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nanohybrid resin composites are widely used in esthetic dentistry, and the choice of an appropriate polishing technique can influence their surface properties. The aim of this study was to compare, Material and Methods: This Results: Prior to polishing, no significant differences in average surface roughness (Ra) were found among the resin groups, indicating adequate standardization: Filtek Z250XT ( Conclusions: Both dry and wet polishing were effective in reducing the surface roughness of Opallis and Tetric N-Ceram resin composites, whereas in Filtek Z250XT, a significant reduction was observed only with wet polishing. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of the polishing procedure may vary depending on the type of resin composite, which should be considered when selecting clinical finishing and polishing protocols to optimize the surface properties of restorative materials.

Identifiers

PMID41064785
PMCPMC12502749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.