Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064783›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025

Impact of Fixation Pins and Metal Sleeves on the Precision of Guided Endodontics: An Analysis Using Extracted Teeth.

Marco Antonio Zaiden Loureiro, Julio Almeida Silva, Lucas Raineri Capeletti, Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal Silva, Maria Luiza Lima Santana, Carlos Estrela, Orlando Aguirre Guedes, Daniel de Almeida Decurcio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco Antonio Zaiden LoureiroSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Julio Almeida SilvaSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lucas Raineri CapelettiSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal SilvaDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Brazil.
Maria Luiza Lima SantanaSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Carlos EstrelaSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Orlando Aguirre GuedesSchool of Dentistry, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil.
Daniel de Almeida DecurcioSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of guided endodontic access and fiberglass post removal, comparing stabilization methods such as metal sleeves and fixation pins. Material and Methods: Sixty-four extracted human teeth (32 mandibular molars and 32 single-rooted teeth) were divided into groups based on the use or non-use of fixation pins and metal sleeves. Precision was assessed using pre- and post-procedure CBCT scans to analyze deviations in bur positioning. Results: For guided endodontic access, significant differences in angular deviation were found between the group using fixation and no sleeves (2.64°) and the group without fixation and sleeves (1.37°) ( Conclusions: Guided endodontic techniques are highly reliable, with metal sleeves and fixation pins offering no significant improvement in precision.

Identifiers

PMID41064783
PMCPMC12502798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.