ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Prevalence of cervical and apical root resorption in maxillary central incisors without orthodontic treatment: A cone-beam computed tomography study in Peruvian individuals.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of cervical and apical root resorption in maxillary central incisors of Peruvian adults without a history of orthodontic treatment, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: This was an observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. The sample included 103 CBCT scans from adult individuals in a Peruvian population, comprising 71 women and 32 men (mean age: 34 ± 32 years). DICOM files were analyzed using RayScan Expert 3D software. The presence of cervical and apical root resorption in permanent maxillary central incisors was assessed by examining coronal, sagittal, and axial sections. Demographic characteristics were also recorded. Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate associations, with a significance level set at Results: The overall prevalence of root resorption was 5.8%, with cervical root resorption accounting for 1.0% and apical root resorption for 4.9%. No significant association was found between sex and the presence of root resorption ( Conclusions: The prevalence of cervical and apical root resorption in maxillary central incisors of untreated Peruvian adults was low. Nevertheless, this condition should be considered by orthodontists during diagnosis and treatment planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.