ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Deep learning driven, image-based phenotyping of seed processing efficiency in sainfoin (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MobileNet-WDD: a lightweight deep learning image classification method for identifying defects in wheat grains.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sainfoin ( Methods: We conducted a multifactorial experiment to evaluate the depodding and dehulling efficiency of five commercially available sainfoin varieties. Seeds were processed using two different methods (belt thresher and impact dehuller) across five sample sizes. A pre-trained Faster R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network) object detection model was fine-tuned to identify intact pods, whole seeds, and split seeds from images of the processed mixtures. These predictions were used to calculate processing efficiency (PE) for each variety. A comprehensive power analysis was performed to determine the minimum sample size of sainfoin pods required to detect differences in PE with high statistical power. Results: We observed strong varietal differences in PE, as well as clear effects of the processing method. Belt threshing produced mixtures with more intact pods, while the impact dehuller generated a higher proportion of split seeds. Increasing sample size led to more intact pods across all varieties and methods, and notably decreased seed proportion in belt-threshed samples. Statistical modeling combined with object detection outputs revealed that a minimum of 2 g of pods is required to reliably detect an absolute proportional difference of 0.25 in PE between two breeding lines with 80% power. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that sainfoin varieties differ significantly in processing efficiency and that processing outcomes depend strongly on both method and sample size. Integrating deep learning-based phenotyping with robust statistical design enables efficient evaluation of processing traits and provides actionable guidelines for breeding programs. While deep learning models offer powerful, cost-effective tools for plant phenotyping, their outputs must be paired with rigorous statistical design to yield reliable and actionable insights for crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.