Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064740›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)2025

Integrating testing volume into bandit algorithms for infectious disease surveillance.

Joshua L Warren, Ottavia Prunas, A David Paltiel, Thomas Thornhill, Gregg S Gonsalves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua L WarrenDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-6970
Ottavia PrunasDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
A David PaltielPublic Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-3290
Thomas ThornhillPublic Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Gregg S GonsalvesPublic Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5789-9841

Funding

Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
Predict, Detect, Diagnose: Confronting Outbreaks of HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Among People Who Use DrugsR01DA060716 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Gregg Steven Gonsalves, Joshua Lindsey Warren · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA060716NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile testing services provide opportunities for active surveillance of infectious diseases for hard-to-reach and/or high-risk individuals who do not know their disease status. Identifying as many infected individuals as possible is important for mitigating disease transmission. Recently, multi-armed bandit sampling approaches have been adapted and applied in this setting to maximize the cumulative number of positive tests collected over time. However, these algorithms have not considered the possibility of variability in the number of tests administered across testing sites. What impact this variability has on the ability of these approaches to maximize yield is currently unknown. Therefore, we investigate this question by extending existing sampling frameworks to directly account for variability in testing volume while also maintaining the computational tractability of the previous methods. Through a simulation study based on human immunodeficiency virus infection characteristics in the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville) as well as an application to COVID-19 testing data in Connecticut, we find improved long- and short-term performances of the new methods compared to several existing approaches. Based on these findings and the ease of computation, we recommend use of the newly developed methods for active surveillance of infectious diseases when variability in testing volume may be present.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceCOVID-19 testingHIV testingmulti-armed banditThompson sampling

Identifiers

PMID41064740
PMCPMC12503114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.