ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
Protection From SARS-CoV-2 Infection With an Oral Nosode (BiosimCovex): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study investigated a potentized, oral homeopathic SARS-CoV-2 nosode (BiosimCovex) for safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity against COVID-19 infection. Methods: A phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 13 sites in India. 2671 unvaccinated, RT-PCR and SARS-CoV-2 antibody-negative participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 6 doses over 3 days of BiosimCovex (1781) or placebo (890). SARS-CoV-2 prevention efficacy was assessed through RT-PCR. Efficacy was defined as 100 x (1-IRR), where IRR is the ratio of positive RT-PCR test rates in the BiosimCovex compared to the placebo group. A two-sided Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence interval was adjusted for surveillance time. Immunogenicity was measured by SARS-CoV-2 antibody conversion at days 15, 30, 45, and 60. Safety was assessed through symptom questionnaires and laboratory studies every 15 days. Illness burden was assessed through symptom diaries. Results: Maximum efficacy occurred at day 45 and was 50.06% overall, 71.88% in individuals aged 18-40 years; and 61.57% in females. By day 45, there were 23 positive RT-PCR cases per group (BiosimCovex 1.3%; placebo 2.6%, Conclusions: A potentized oral nosode was safe and appeared to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and be immunogenic over 60 days. Effectiveness was highest at day 45 in females and in the 18- to 40-year-old age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.