Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064692›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Intensified Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Andrea Llamas-Lopez, James A Seddon, Felicia C Chow, Caryn M Upton, Sanjay K Jain, Jan-Willem Alffenaar, Daniel J Grint, Kelly Dooley, Rob Aarnoutse, Fiona V Cresswell

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Llamas-LopezLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-2694
James A SeddonDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-2302
Felicia C ChowDepartments of Neurology and Medicine (Infectious Diseases), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Caryn M UptonUniversity of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-3320
Sanjay K JainDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-7070
Jan-Willem AlffenaarUniversity of Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-0288
Daniel J GrintLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-6544
Kelly DooleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Rob AarnoutseDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fiona V CresswellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-532X

Funding

Preclinical modeling to study Tuberculous MeningitisR01AI145435 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JAIN, SANJAY · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
Pro-apoptotic Drugs as Host-Directed Treatments for Pulmonary Tuberculosis”R01AI190038 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sanjay K Jain · 2025 to 2026
$1.6M
Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of adjunctive linezolid for the treatment of tuberculous meningitisR21TW011035 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHOW, FELICIA C. · 2018 to 2019
$322k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011035NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145435NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI190038Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains the deadliest form of tuberculosis. Inadequate penetration of rifampicin and ethambutol into the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may contribute to mortality. Over the last decade, research has focused on "intensified" treatment (higher-dose first-line drugs or addition of second-line drugs with good CSF penetration). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of intensified TBM treatment on mortality, disability, and safety. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted of clinical trials examining intensified TBM treatments compared with a rifampicin-based standard-of-care regimen in adults. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model with mortality as the primary outcome, with OR <1 indicating lower mortality. Disability and safety were examined as secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses included (1) higher-dose rifampicin, (2) addition of fluoroquinolones, and (3) addition of linezolid. Results: Ten trials meeting eligibility criteria, involving 1369 participants, were included. Higher-dose rifampicin (n = 1050; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.35; Conclusions: Current clinical trial evidence does not support the use of intensified TBM treatment in adults. However, these analyses are limited by diverse TBM case definitions, absence of MRC grading at enrollment, variable rifampicin dosing, limited data on linezolid and higher-dose isoniazid, and heterogeneous disability and safety outcomes. Use of uniform case definitions and consistent endpoints is essential to standardize data.

Indexed as

intensifiedTBMtreatmenttuberculous meningitis

Identifiers

PMID41064692
PMCPMC12502660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.