Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064647›Full record

ReviewGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2025

Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Surgical Approach, Post-Resection Follow-Up, and Role of Endoscopic Ablation on Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.

Miguel Martins, Carlota Branco, Miguel Bispo, Alexandra Fernandes, Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Filipe Vilas-Boas, Jorge Paulino, Portuguese Pancreatic Club, specialized section of the Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miguel MartinsGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Carlota BrancoLuz Hospital Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel BispoDigestive Oncology Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandra FernandesGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Eduardo Rodrigues-PintoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Tiago Cúrdia GonçalvesGastroenterology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave - Hospital de Guimarães, Guimaraes, Portugal.
Filipe Vilas-BoasGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Jorge PaulinoLuz Hospital Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Portuguese Pancreatic Club
specialized section of the Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are lesions with malignant potential that should be addressed differently according to clinical/morphological criteria, to ensure appropriate cancer prevention and while avoiding overtreatment. Summary: Surgical resection remains the gold standard for high-risk PCNs (at least one high-risk stigmata, multiple "worrisome" features), whereas low-risk PCNs should be monitored through imaging to mitigate the non-negligible risk of postoperative complications. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapies, such as injection or radiofrequency, may offer a minimally invasive and effective therapeutic option particularly for patients unfit for surgery, although their impact on prognostic (i.e., mortality) remains uncertain. Key Messages: This review summarizes the latest recommendations on surgical management and post-resection follow-up of PCNs and the potential role of EUS ablation in the treatment algorithm.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ablationEndosonographyIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPancreatic cyst neoplasmsPancreatic surgeryPostoperative follow-up

Identifiers

PMID41064647
PMCPMC12503893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.