ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Energy Output Variability Among Phacoemulsification Tips Using Calorimetry.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if using different phacoemulsification (phaco) tips will impact thermal energy output utilizing calorimetry. Methods: The Alcon Centurion was used with the Infiniti OZil handpiece and balanced, hybrid, or MST Dewey A1 mini tip. Settings were 100% power, continuous torsional or longitudinal ultrasound, 0mmHg vacuum limit, and flow rate 12mL/min. Outflow tubing was removed from the handpiece and inflow tubing was manually occluded. The handpiece tip was placed into the calorimeter filled with 50mL of degassed deionized water and ultrasound was initiated for 1 minute. Temperature rise and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) were recorded; ten trials were performed for each group. Results: Statistically significant differences in energy output, measured in Joules, were found between all three tips in both ultrasound modes. Balanced tips showed the highest output, Dewey tips had the lowest. Hybrid tips had significantly increased output in longitudinal mode, whereas Dewey tips had significantly decreased output in longitudinal mode. No significant differences were seen in CDE between tips in either ultrasound mode, but significant increases were seen in longitudinal mode within each tip. Conclusion: This study demonstrated differences in thermal energy production of three different phaco handpiece tips. This provides insight into how thermal injuries occur and what might cause these differences. Our methodology provides a novel way for accurate energy measurement at the tip, though it differs when compared to external energy production measurements. Surgeons should take into consideration the significant variability in thermal energy created by handpiece tips.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.