Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064581›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Optimizing CI Systems for Better Recognition of Soft Speech -the Concept of Broad-Range Mapping.

Matthias Hey, Thomas Hocke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias HeyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-0833
Thomas HockeCochlear Hannover Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The individual mapping of cochlear implants (CIs) aims to optimize the user's speech understanding. Recent investigations have shown the importance of soft speech: (1) According to Datalog studies, a large proportion of speech components lies in the range below 60 dB, and (2) soft speech represents a separate category in CI outcome, in addition to supra-threshold speech and speech in noise. Soft-speech understanding can be influenced by optimizing T-values or by global parameters (loudness growth and TSPL in the Nucleus system). This study focussed on improving soft speech below 60 dB by optimizing loudness growth. Methods: Speech understanding with varying loudness growth in the speech processor CP11 (Cochlear Ltd.) was compared in 20 experienced adult CI users. The mean soft-speech score based on monosyllabic words at 40 and 50 dB was introduced for quantification. Results: Six of the 20 patients studied showed significant individual improvement for soft speech when loudness growth was optimized, while none showed a significant decrease under quiet or noisy test conditions. Conclusion: Actual CI systems offer a broad loudness range of speech understanding. In addition to suprathreshold speech understanding, additional attention should be paid to soft speech, and the result should therefore be confirmed by speech audiometry at low levels. Levels of Evidence: 2.

Indexed as

cochlear implantloudness growthquiet speechScanFFsoft speechspeech comprehension

Identifiers

PMID41064581
PMCPMC12501760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.