Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064564›Full record

ArticleBelitung nursing journal2025

Digital devices usage barriers among community-dwelling older adults in Abha, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Manal Mohammed Hawash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manal Mohammed HawashDepartment of Public Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1185-1164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Modern communities increasingly rely on technology, influencing older adults' health and daily life. While technology can enhance quality of life and independence, various barriers limit digital adoption among older adults. Objective: This study aimed to identify barriers to digital device use among community-dwelling older adults in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional survey of 400 adults aged 60 years and older. Data were collected from February to March 2025 on depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), cognitive status (Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination), and technology-related barriers (Technology Usage Barriers Questionnaire). Data were analyzed using Results: Smartphone users reported significantly higher barriers than feature phone users in personal (8.07 ± 4.50 versus 5.70 ± 5.09; Conclusion: Older adults, especially smartphone users, women, those with lower education, low income, unemployed individuals, and rural residents, face substantial barriers to digital adoption. Tailored digital literacy programs, affordable access, and senior-friendly device design are essential to reduce the digital divide and improve autonomy, inclusion, and quality of life. For nursing practice, these findings emphasize the importance of assessing older adults' digital skills, providing targeted education, and advocating for technology solutions that support engagement and health management.

Indexed as

barriersdigital devicesfeature phonesolder adultsSaudi Arabiasmartphonestechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID41064564
PMCPMC12502753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.