Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064531›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Outcomes of Cystic Versus Solid Renal Masses After Surgery: A Prospective Single-centre Comparative Cohort Study.

Salvatore Granata, David Ka-Wai Leung, Alessio Pecoraro, Antonio Crescente, Chi-Fai Ng, Jeremy Y C Teoh, Sergio Serni, Lorenzo Masieri, Riccardo Campi, Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salvatore GranataDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
David Ka-Wai LeungDivision of Urology, S H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Alessio PecoraroDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Antonio CrescenteDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Chi-Fai NgDivision of Urology, S H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jeremy Y C TeohDivision of Urology, S H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Sergio SerniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo MasieriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Cystic renal masses pose unique diagnostic and management challenges. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, histopathological features, and midterm oncological outcomes of patients with cystic versus solid renal masses treated with surgery at a referral academic centre. Methods: We prospectively collected data from patients with cT1-T2 renal masses who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy from January 2017 to May 2024. Cystic masses were classified according to the Bosniak 2019 classification. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with malignant cystic versus solid tumours. Key findings and limitations: We included 993 patients (13% with cystic masses). Preoperative characteristics were similar between patients with solid and cystic masses, except for a larger median tumour diameter in the cystic group. Intra- and postoperative outcomes were also comparable between the study groups. The proportion of malignant tumours was 86% in cystic and 74% in solid masses ( Conclusions and clinical implications: A non-negligible proportion of patients with surgically treated localised renal masses, especially if solid or Bosniak III cystic, harboured a benign tumour, warranting better preoperative tumour characterisation to provide value-based care. Midterm oncological outcomes were similar between malignant solid and cystic renal masses, confirming the need for risk-based postoperative follow-up regardless of tumour nature. Patient summary: We studied a large group of patients who underwent surgery for kidney masses, comparing those that were mainly filled with fluid (cystic) to those that were solid. Although cystic kidney masses were more often cancerous, the chances of remaining cancer-free after surgery were similar for both types. The cystic or solid nature of the mass alone did not determine whether it was malignant. Disease-free survival was similar between cystic and solid tumours, and DFS was not significantly different between patients with Bosniak IV and IIF-III malignant cystic masses. Our findings support an individualized approach to the management of cystic renal masses, with the goal of avoiding unnecessary surgery while still effectively addressing cancer risk.

Indexed as

Bosniak classificationCystic renal massHistologyNephrectomyRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41064531
PMCPMC12501355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.