Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Harmonizing health: a global analysis of pharmaceutical regulatory activities by international regulatory organizations.

Agnes Dangy-Caye, Alice Mousset, Adem Kermad, Louise Bouché-Bazerolle, Magda Bujar, Maria-Lucia De Lucia, Neil McAuslane, Rebecca Lumsden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agnes Dangy-CayeRegulatory Science and Policy Europe, Sanofi, Paris, France.
Alice MoussetRegulatory Science and Policy Europe, Sanofi, Paris, France.
Adem KermadCentre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom.
Louise Bouché-BazerolleRegulatory Science and Policy Europe, Sanofi, Paris, France.
Magda BujarCentre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom.
Maria-Lucia De LuciaRegulatory Science and Policy International, Sanofi, Barcelone, Spain.
Neil McAuslaneCentre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca LumsdenRegulatory Science and Policy Europe, Sanofi, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study demonstrates the role of six international organizations ICH, WHO, PIC/S, IPRP, ICMRA and IMDRF in shaping global health policies and advancing pharmaceutical progress. These six key organizations have been selected based on three criteria: focus on healthcare regulation, international scope, and no geographic restriction on membership. This analysis aimed to map the complementarity of these organizations' activities. Methods: For this purpose, a mapping of activities was performed, which identified 10 domains: clinical, convergence and reliance, digital, generics and biosimilars, innovative therapies, medical devices, non-clinical, pharmacovigilance, public health, and quality. Five main types of outputs were also identified: collaborative work, guidance, information, standards and norms, and training. Results: Key takeaways show that the most active domains among international regulatory organizations are quality, public health, convergence and reliance, and pharmacovigilance. But emerging priorities, such as digital health and innovative therapies, are also captured, demonstrating the regulatory framework is constantly evolving. A focus on one of the domains has been made, convergence and reliance, to demonstrate the impact to be part in one of these international organizations: a detailed analysis showcases the advantages of ICH membership, especially its positive impact on reducing submission lag times for new active substances in member countries. Collaboration between international organizations strengthens global regulatory systems. Our study evaluated the interaction between regional and international memberships. Participation in regional organizations correlated with membership in international organizations, suggesting these memberships facilitate involvement in global regulatory framework activities. Global harmonization of technical standards across regulatory frameworks is extremely challenging. Therefore, additionally a comparison was made between ICH members and non-members to observe any influence of ICH on broader multinational engagement. ICH member countries were found to be more active participants in the international regulatory organizations compared to non-member countries. Discussion: This research highlights the critical role of international regulatory organizations in harmonizing global regulatory frameworks and fostering pharmaceutical innovation. Their collaborative efforts and synergies contribute to a robust and cohesive regulatory landscape, ultimately benefiting patients worldwide. By promoting cooperation and knowledge sharing, these organizations ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of medicines and healthcare products on a global scale.

Indexed as

harmonizationICHICMRAIMDRFIPRPregulatory organizationsrelianceWHO

Identifiers

PMID41064519
PMCPMC12500574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.