Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064515›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Efficacy of encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation and FMT via rectal enema for irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (CAP-ENEMA FMT Trial).

Natsuda Aumpan, Soonthorn Chonprasertsuk, Bubpha Pornthisarn, Sith Siramolpiwat, Patommatat Bhanthumkomol, Navapan Issariyakulkarn, Pornpen Gamnarai, Phubordee Bongkotvirawan, Arti Wongcha-Um, Varocha Mahachai and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06201182 (Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06201182 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThammasat UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsIrritable Bowel SyndromeArmsFMT via rectal enema, FMT capsules, Placebo via rectal enema, Placebo capsules
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation BeyondJournal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natsuda AumpanCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Soonthorn ChonprasertsukCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Bubpha PornthisarnCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Sith SiramolpiwatCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Patommatat BhanthumkomolCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Navapan IssariyakulkarnCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Pornpen GamnaraiCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Phubordee BongkotvirawanCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Arti Wongcha-UmCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Varocha MahachaiDepartment of Medicine, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine (CICM) at Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Ratha-Korn VilaichoneCenter of Excellence in Digestive diseases and Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder. Gut dysbiosis involves in pathogenesis of IBS. Limited studies compared efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) via different routes of administration. This study aimed to compare efficacy of encapsulated FMT, FMT via rectal enema, and placebo in IBS patients. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with IBS defined by Rome IV criteria at Thammasat university, Thailand. Patients were randomized into three groups: (1) encapsulated FMT (six capsules twice daily for two consecutive days, total 50 g of stool), (2) FMT via rectal enema (50 g of stool in 200 mL of isotonic saline), or (3) placebo. Primary endpoint was clinical response defined by ≥50-point decrease in IBS-symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and changes of fecal microbiota composition after treatment. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT06201182. Results: From August 20, 2020, to February 15, 2024, 45 patients were randomized to receive encapsulated FMT ( Conclusions: Higher clinical response and quality of life were demonstrated in both FMT groups than placebo. Either encapsulated FMT or FMT via rectal enema was safe and could provide favorable outcomes for IBS patients. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06201182, Identifier: NCT06201182.

Indexed as

capsulefecal microbiota transplantationfecal transplantirritable bowel syndromerectal enema

Identifiers

PMID41064515
PMCPMC12500633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.