ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy of encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation and FMT via rectal enema for irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (CAP-ENEMA FMT Trial).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06201182 (Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation BeyondJournal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
- Antibiotic-Driven Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis: Resistome Dynamics, Metabolic Disruption, and Paths to Restoration.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Restoring Microbial Balance: Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Pediatric Disorders.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Irritable bowel syndrome management: current insights.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- IBS and SIBO: Gut Microbiota, Pathophysiology, and Non-Pharmacological Interventions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting Irritable Bowel Syndrome Through Diet and Mechanism-Based Therapies: A Pathophysiological Approach.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review of mechanisms and microbiome-based therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder. Gut dysbiosis involves in pathogenesis of IBS. Limited studies compared efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) via different routes of administration. This study aimed to compare efficacy of encapsulated FMT, FMT via rectal enema, and placebo in IBS patients. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with IBS defined by Rome IV criteria at Thammasat university, Thailand. Patients were randomized into three groups: (1) encapsulated FMT (six capsules twice daily for two consecutive days, total 50 g of stool), (2) FMT via rectal enema (50 g of stool in 200 mL of isotonic saline), or (3) placebo. Primary endpoint was clinical response defined by ≥50-point decrease in IBS-symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and changes of fecal microbiota composition after treatment. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT06201182. Results: From August 20, 2020, to February 15, 2024, 45 patients were randomized to receive encapsulated FMT ( Conclusions: Higher clinical response and quality of life were demonstrated in both FMT groups than placebo. Either encapsulated FMT or FMT via rectal enema was safe and could provide favorable outcomes for IBS patients. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06201182, Identifier: NCT06201182.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.