Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Exclusion and inequity: a national analysis of disability-inclusive admission criteria in Saudi medical schools.

Anwar A Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anwar A SayedDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Equitable access to medical education is essential for building a diverse and inclusive healthcare workforce. Despite national disability legislation in Saudi Arabia, the extent to which undergraduate medical programs implement inclusive admission criteria remains unclear. This study evaluates the inclusiveness of admission policies for students with disabilities across all undergraduate MBBS programs in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional review of the official admission policies of 32 universities was conducted. Data were extracted from university websites to identify whether institutions provided inclusive pathways, accommodations for disability, or used exclusionary language or environmental/institutional barriers related to disability. Results: Only 6 of 32 universities-exclusively public institutions-had formal disability-inclusive policies. The remaining schools either lacked inclusive provisions, support structures or required medical fitness documentation that could exclude applicants with physical, sensory, or mental impairments. Private universities showed no evidence of inclusive admissions. Discussion: Most Saudi medical schools maintain exclusionary, ambiguous, or unsupportive admission practices, undermining national commitments to disability rights and global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4 and 10). Urgent institutional reforms are needed to dismantle barriers and ensure transparency, equity, supportive environments, and accessibility for applicants with disabilities in health professions education.

Indexed as

admission criteriadisability inclusionequity in medical educationhealthcare workforce diversityinclusive education policiesMBBS programsmedical school admissionsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41064506
PMCPMC12502081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.