ArticleJOR spine2025
Age and Spinal Level as Predictors of Lumbar Disc Degeneration in Humans and Mice: A Comparative Analysis.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Paravertebral muscle quality and adjacent facet joint degeneration as significant predictors of ASDis revision after lumbar fusion.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Advancing Basic and Preclinical Spine Research: Highlights From the ORS PSRS 7th International Spine Research Symposium.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Article
- Age and Spinal Level as Predictors of Lumbar Disc Degeneration in Humans and Mice: A Comparative Analysis.JOR spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Aging is a major risk factor for IVD degeneration and chronic lower back pain. Comparing degenerative patterns in human and mice, a commonly used pre-clinical model, is crucial for validating it in preclinical mechanistic research. The goal of the study was to compare the effect of age and spine level on degeneration in human and mouse lumbar IVDs. Methods: T2-weighted MRI images of human lumbar spine were graded using the Pfirrmann system. H&E-stained mid-coronal sections of mouse lumbar IVDs were scored using the Melgoza and Chenna system. Age, gender, IVD level, and lumbar IVD degeneration scores, respectively, were used for statistical analysis in each species. Linear regression and one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey analysis were used to compare regression slopes and intercepts. Age conversion from mouse to human was performed according to the Jackson Laboratory's outline of mouse age and its human equivalents. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to model continuous degeneration scores, accounting for intra-subject correlation due to multiple IVD levels per subject. Main effects included sex, IVD level (L1-S1), and age, with an interaction term assessing the impact of age across levels. An autoregressive correlation structure was specified. Results: Age significantly correlated with IVD degeneration in humans ( Conclusions: Age and spinal IVD level influence lumbar IVD degeneration in both human and mice with a higher rate of degeneration at the lumbosacral junction in both species. These findings suggest that mice are a suitable model for studying the cellular and molecular basis of IVD degeneration and associated neurological symptoms, with the L6-S1 level being the most relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.