ArticleDrug, healthcare and patient safety2025
Establishing of a National Diagnostic Reference Level for Radiation Dose in Digital Paediatric Pelvic X-Rays in Jordan: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technical strategies for radiation dose optimisation in paediatric pelvic radiography: a systematic review.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paediatric pelvic X-rays are essential for diagnosing injuries and developmental abnormalities but pose radiation risks to sensitive children. Dose Reference Levels (DRLs) play a critical role in optimising radiographic procedures, ensuring both safety and high-quality imaging. Objective: This research aimed to establish a National Dose Reference Level (NDRL) for digital paediatric pelvic X-rays in Jordan to optimise radiation doses, improve diagnostic accuracy, and minimise risks. Methods: A Multicenter retrospective analysis was performed on paediatric Anterior-Posterior (AP) digital pelvic X-rays from various 12 Jordanian healthcare institutions. Parameters including Kilovoltage peak (kVp), milli Ampere second (mAs), and Focal to Skin Distance (FSD) were collected. Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) was indirectly calculated following international guidelines. Results: The study analysed 1,674 paediatric pelvic X-rays, finding a mean ESD of 0.69 milli-Gray (mGy). The 75th percentile ESD, or (DRL), was 0.612 mGy overall, with age-specific DRLs of 0.265 mGy (0 to <1 year), 0.382 mGy (1 to <5 years), 0.704 mGy (5 to <10 years), and 0.995 mGy (10 to ≤15 years). Conclusion: The study revealed age-dependent variations and notable disparities in radiation doses among various healthcare institutions in Jordan. Establishing the NDRL of 0.612 mGy provides a benchmark for dose optimisation and aligns Jordan's practices with international standards. The findings can guide national radiation protection policies and clinical guidelines, enhance paediatric imaging practices, and minimise unnecessary radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.