ArticlePulse (Basel, Switzerland)
Human Aortic Vasoreactivity in Response to Various Stimuli: A Review.
Article in Pulse (Basel, Switzerland). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential Cardiovascular Risks of Phenethylamine Analogues in Food Supplements: Evidence from Vasocontraction of Rat Artery Segments.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aorta plays a crucial role in the blood circulation through its Windkessel function, buffering blood volume and regulating blood pressure. While traditionally viewed as primarily passive, this function may be actively regulated by vascular smooth muscle cells in the aortic wall through vasoconstriction or -dilation. Despite the widespread use of antihypertensive drugs that target vascular tone, our understanding of human aortic vasoreactivity remains limited. This review therefore aimed to evaluate the vasoreactivity of the human aorta in response to various pharmacological and non-pharmacological stimuli. Summary: A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted for articles published before January 1, 2024. Of the 1,179 articles that were screened for inclusion, 30 articles met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies involved ex vivo examinations, while 20 studies involved in vivo measurements. Ex vivo pharmacological testing revealed vasoconstriction induced by adrenergic and endothelin-A receptor agonists and prostanoids. Pharmacological vasodilation was observed following in vivo or ex vivo administration of nitrates and calcium channel blockers, although acetylcholine did not induce vasodilation ex vivo. Additionally, tobacco smoking and intravenous cocaine use were associated with vasoconstriction, whereas anesthetic agents were involved in potential aortic vasodilation. Key Messages: These findings challenge the traditional view of the aorta as a passive conduit, highlighting its vasoconstrictive and vasodilative properties in response to vasoactive stimuli. This revised understanding has significant implications for prescribing antihypertensive drugs, which commonly have vasodilatory effects. The potential impact of these vasoactive therapies on the aorta's Windkessel function warrants careful consideration, particularly in patients with aortic pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.