Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064415›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Factors Influencing Patient Decisions to Discharge Against Medical Advice from Hospital Emergency: Insights From a Saudi Tertiary Hospital.

Safinaz M Alshiakh, Abdullah S Algarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Safinaz M AlshiakhDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-1048
Abdullah S AlgarniDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9802-5852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is a critical global issue in emergency departments (EDs), as it leads to adverse patient outcomes, higher readmission rates, and increased hospital costs. In Saudi Arabia, evidence on the underlying causes of DAMA and its impact on healthcare operations remains limited. This study aimed to identify the factors contributing to DAMA among Saudi patients and explore potential strategies for its reduction. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 at our University Hospital using a convenience sampling method through a self-reported online questionnaire, with a response rate of 78%. A total of 297 participants were included, with females comprising 54.4% and males 45.5%. The most represented age group in the DAMA category was 31-42 years (39.5%). Educational backgrounds varied, with 18.9% having no formal education and another 18.9% holding a master's degree. Most participants (54.2%) received care at government hospitals, 72.4% lacked medical insurance, and 14.5% had previous DAMA incidents. The leading reasons for DAMA were financial burden (53.5%), lack of available beds (52.5%), and patient/relative fatigue (50.5%). Nationality was significantly associated with DAMA, with 30.2% of non-Saudis affected compared to 15.7% of Saudis (

Indexed as

discharge against medical advice (DAMA)emergency departmentfactorsperceptionSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41064415
PMCPMC12501447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.