ArticleBioImpacts : BI2025
Development, in vitro, and in vivo assessments of PCL-gelatin-βTCP fibrous scaffolds for cardiac regeneration.
Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide. Tissue engineering offers a promising solution for promoting tissue regeneration at the infarcted site. In this study, beta-tricalcium phosphate (βTCP) was incorporated into poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and gelatin (Gel) fibers for cardiac patch applications. Methods: Electrospun scaffolds were prepared via electrospinning a 1:1 (w/w) mixture of PCL and Gel, embedding varying concentrations of βTCP at 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 3 wt.%. The scaffolds were analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), tensile strength testing, hemolysis assays, toxicity testing, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for marker gene expression. Furthermore, subcutaneous scaffold implantation was performed to assess in vivo angiogenesis in NMRI mice. Tissue samples were examined using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry. Results: According to the results, βTCP was uniformly distributed throughout the fiber scaffold, exhibiting a smooth, unbranched morphology with fiber diameters of approximately 75 μm. Specifically, the mean diameters for PCL-Gel and PCL-Gel-βTCP at 3 wt.% were 45.01 ± 2.82 μm and 100.91 ± 11.69 μm, respectively. Mechanical property assessments revealed that the elastic modulus of the scaffolds was suitable for usage as a tissue-engineered cardiac patch. Scaffolds containing βTCP exhibited favorable blood compatibility and indicated no cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations. Furthermore, the expression levels of cardiac marker genes (Actn4, Connexin43, and TrpT2) were elevated in the treatment groups in conjunction with the escalation of βTCP dosage. Fiber composites with 1% βTCP were selected as the optimal scaffold for Conclusion: The fibrous PCL-Gel-βTCP-1% scaffold showed optimal cell proliferation, blood compatibility and vascularization. These properties highlight its promise for cardiac tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.